So I was given the task of ensuring that this HDD's data is removed. It's a scsi drive.Usually I'd just use a program like killdisk, but the catch here is that the drive is no longer recognized.It's full of patient data and shit for a local doctor's office.My question: Will it be sufficient to removed the platters from the drive and fuck'em up real good? I mean, I can scratch the everliving shit out of them, and I know it's not exactly conventional, but will it suffice?
3/15/2006 12:57:39 PM
Just open the hard drive. Once you do that, someone would have to rebuild and repair the drive in a clean room environment. I don't think anyone wants your data badly enough to go through the effort.
3/15/2006 1:01:15 PM
Drop it off a building.
3/15/2006 1:01:26 PM
I was thinking about removing the platter and running it up and down the pavement outside.but I wasnt sure if that was as good as a DoD wipe.
3/15/2006 1:08:59 PM
just smash the platters with a hammer
3/15/2006 1:12:25 PM
Just take it home and throw it in your trash. Problem solved.
3/15/2006 1:12:44 PM
^ He wants the drive back though.I thought of the same thing.I may just remove the platters and give the shell back to him. and take the platters home and fuck'em up.
3/15/2006 1:13:37 PM
Drill holes through the drive...maybe in the shape of a smiley face? or a dollar sign? get creative!
3/15/2006 1:19:19 PM
I popped it open and scratched the fuck out of both sides of the platter.and I put a hole or two in the platter as well.and I broke off the R/W head.and I took a magnet to the platter.DoD's got nothing on this.
3/15/2006 1:21:02 PM
From the NIST Data Sanitation guide
3/15/2006 1:23:47 PM
So you're saying I should hammer the platter, then take a heat gun to it?THE IS THE BEST $40 I'VE EVER EARNED.
3/15/2006 1:25:43 PM
The best way is to degauss it. Pass it through an extremely strong electromagnetic field. The data is on the disk using shifts in the polarity of a magnetic film. Exposing it to enough of a magnetic field will "shift" all of the bits to one polarity and the data will be gone.[Edited on March 15, 2006 at 2:11 PM. Reason : +]
3/15/2006 2:06:58 PM
what does the Department of Defense have to do with your hdd
3/15/2006 3:21:18 PM
take an electric sander to it while you're at it, sanding off the magnetic film promotes the reconstruction of that data to the realm of the damn near impossibleanything that doesn't involve warping, vaporizing, shredding, or otherwise physically mangling the magnetic film of the platters (if not the platters themselves) will leave partial polarizations of previous bit states in the film that, while very difficult and expensive to recover, is firmly within the realm of the possibleone of these days our security agencies will start relying on encryption to safeguard our national secrets, instead of really hoping nobody steals the hardware until they destroy it
3/15/2006 3:25:01 PM
If anyone gets data off that drive, I'll shit myself.The scratches, dents, and holes I put in it were beastly.
3/15/2006 3:30:54 PM
3/15/2006 4:05:19 PM
and they created the TCP/IP suite
3/15/2006 4:15:13 PM
3/15/2006 5:00:56 PM
best
3/15/2006 8:04:24 PM
I believe your best choice is to shred the HD.....literally shed it.If the doctors office is going to pay for it, there are several companies that will shed your HD into millions of little pieces
3/15/2006 8:06:16 PM
^Agreed. I don't know why he wants it back. If you can't destroy the drive with software, destroy it with hardware. If somebody wanted to badly enough, they could send that drive in to one of those "clean-room" recovery centers and get the data off of it.Bobby, everybody knows we got TCP/IP from the Roswell aliens.
3/15/2006 8:42:10 PM
just take an acytalene cutting torch to it.
3/15/2006 8:46:21 PM
3/15/2006 8:52:27 PM
thermite cures everything
3/15/2006 9:20:14 PM
wipe poop all over it. no way anyone will use it after that
3/15/2006 9:56:40 PM
Yeah, I most def. fucked that drive up.I only charged him $40, mainly because it was such a good time.I took a heat gun to the controller card and the platters, removed a few capacitors with my pliers, and all the stuff I mentioned above.That data is fucking gone.I KNOCKED IT'S FUCKING THROAT OFF.
3/15/2006 10:17:33 PM
best idea so far:
3/15/2006 11:11:08 PM
I'll have to agree, thermite ALWAYS wins
3/15/2006 11:15:42 PM
TOO BAD IT TAKES FOREVER TO FUCKING MAKE.
3/16/2006 9:12:14 AM
will standard ide hd platters shatter when you hammer them? i had a laptop hd that pulled apart and left the platter on the floor (for whatever dumb reason)...i rolled over it with my desk chair and the damnable thing shattered all over the place...took forever to pick up the pieces
3/16/2006 9:37:13 AM
if i paid someone to DoD a hd in compliance with HIPAA regs i would expect them to actually follow DoD standards and not just scratch it on the pavement and run a heat gun over it
3/16/2006 10:25:38 AM
and yet...i'm betting GraniteBalls' method was more effective than any simple removal of data...besides, his boss doesn't know jack about DoD standards, he's probably just copying some television show
3/16/2006 10:48:24 AM
yeah but you cant go playing around with "just as good" methods when it comes to HIPAA regs
3/16/2006 10:52:03 AM
SHRED(1) User Commands SHRED(1)NAME shred - delete a file securely, first overwriting it to hide its contentsSYNOPSIS shred [OPTIONS] FILE [...]DESCRIPTION Overwrite the specified FILE(s) repeatedly, in order to make it harder for even very expensive hardware probing to recover the data. Mandatory arguments to long options are mandatory for short options too. -f, --force change permissions to allow writing if necessary -n, --iterations=N Overwrite N times instead of the default (25) -s, --size=N shred this many bytes (suffixes like K, M, G accepted) -u, --remove truncate and remove file after overwriting -v, --verbose show progress -x, --exact do not round file sizes up to the next full block; this is the default for non-regular files -z, --zero add a final overwrite with zeros to hide shredding - shred standard output --help display this help and exit --version output version information and exit Delete FILE(s) if --remove (-u) is specified. The default is not to remove the files because it is common to operate on device files like /dev/hda, and those files usually should not be removed. When operating on regular files, most people use the --remove option. CAUTION: Note that shred relies on a very important assumption: that the filesystem overwrites data in place. This is the tradi- tional way to do things, but many modern filesystem designs do not satisfy this assumption. The following are examples of filesys- tems on which shred is not effective: * log-structured or journaled filesystems, such as those supplied with AIX and Solaris (and JFS, ReiserFS, XFS, Ext3, etc.) * filesystems that write redundant data and carry on even if some writes fail, such as RAID-based filesystems * filesystems that make snapshots, such as Network Appliance's NFS server * filesystems that cache in temporary locations, such as NFS version 3 clients * compressed filesystems In addition, file system backups and remote mirrors may contain copies of the file that cannot be removed, and that will allow a shredded file to be recovered later.AUTHOR Written by Colin Plumb.REPORTING BUGS Report bugs to <bug-coreutils@gnu.org>.COPYRIGHT Copyright (C) 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.SEE ALSO The full documentation for shred is maintained as a Texinfo manual. If the info and shred programs are properly installed at your site, the command info coreutils shred should give you access to the complete manual.shred (coreutils) 5.2.1 July 2004 SHRED(1)(works in cygwin)
3/16/2006 10:53:41 AM
3/16/2006 11:39:48 AM