User not logged in - login - register
Home Calendar Books School Tool Photo Gallery Message Boards Users Statistics Advertise Site Info
go to bottom | |
 Message Boards » » Minolta is getting out of the camera business Page [1]  
chocolatervh
All American
22986 Posts
user info
edit post

btw, nikon is pretty much going strickly digital now too... wassup with that?

1/20/2006 11:39:47 AM

30thAnnZ
Suspended
31803 Posts
user info
edit post

because it's the future?

1/20/2006 11:46:37 AM

chocolatervh
All American
22986 Posts
user info
edit post

welp apparently not for minolta.

but i guess nikon feels that the wave of digital overshadows film enough to just pull out of film and stick to straight digital cameras.

minolta just couldn't keep up with all of the technology, who's CCD is bigger rat race.

1/20/2006 12:40:43 PM

EhSteve
All American
7240 Posts
user info
edit post

in cameras it's always Nikon this and Canon that.

hardly anyone around here talks about minolta afaik.

1/20/2006 1:00:26 PM

30thAnnZ
Suspended
31803 Posts
user info
edit post

minolta's been more about medium to high level printers and scanners for years anyway

1/20/2006 1:10:40 PM

chocolatervh
All American
22986 Posts
user info
edit post

true, but stopping camera production (besides the dslr thing with sony) all together is kinda crazy... yet HP cameras keep on going...

i'd pick a minolta over a kodak anyday...

1/20/2006 2:08:34 PM

Docido
All American
4642 Posts
user info
edit post

When it comes to the higher end (dslr's) no one would buy a HP though. Pretty much same with Minolta.

Its Canon/Nikon >>>>>>> Olympus/Mintolta/Fujifilm etc.

This is hardly a surprise they're quitting. I've never even seen a Minolta point-n-shoot.

1/20/2006 2:42:15 PM

Protostar
All American
3495 Posts
user info
edit post

I love those Pentax Optio commericials. Opptio!!!!

1/20/2006 5:40:07 PM

phildog
Veteran
236 Posts
user info
edit post

does anyone have some hard evidence about the nikon deal? I heard about it, I would just like to have some hard evidence...

1/20/2006 7:55:09 PM

stowaway
All American
11770 Posts
user info
edit post

what nikon deal?

1/20/2006 8:02:53 PM

MacGyver
Suspended
6745 Posts
user info
edit post

I dont even know anyone who uses a non digital camera anymore.

1/20/2006 8:18:57 PM

stowaway
All American
11770 Posts
user info
edit post

I still get better prints from negatives than I do from digital cameras. Camera costs ~700, film is ~2.50 a roll, 20x24 and larger prints have better sharpness and color compared to any camera costing less than 12k.

1/20/2006 8:26:54 PM

Docido
All American
4642 Posts
user info
edit post


1/20/2006 9:12:52 PM

stowaway
All American
11770 Posts
user info
edit post

http://www.cnn.com/2006/BUSINESS/01/12/nikon.camera.ap/index.html
http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/01/12/nikon.film.ap/index.html

all it means is that consumers buy a film camera every 5-15 years and a new digital cameras every 2-3 years. there is no need to spend money producing cameras that very few buy when their manufacturing and R&D $$$ can go to new digital cameras.

[Edited on January 20, 2006 at 9:38 PM. Reason : ]

1/20/2006 9:34:00 PM

 Message Boards » Tech Talk » Minolta is getting out of the camera business Page [1]  
go to top | |
Admin Options : move topic | lock topic

© 2024 by The Wolf Web - All Rights Reserved.
The material located at this site is not endorsed, sponsored or provided by or on behalf of North Carolina State University.
Powered by CrazyWeb v2.39 - our disclaimer.