http://news.com.com/Create+an+e-annoyance%2C+go+to+jail/2010-1028_3-6022491.html?part=rss&tag=6022491&subj=news
1/9/2006 7:54:51 PM
YAY SALISBURYBOY IS REALLY GONE!
1/9/2006 8:03:44 PM
news.com.com... isn't that a few too many?
1/9/2006 8:04:13 PM
i'm sure it'll eventually be struck down
1/9/2006 8:38:57 PM
That's fucking ridiculous.
1/9/2006 9:10:11 PM
http://www.thewolfweb.com/message_topic.aspx?topic=378056
1/9/2006 9:17:53 PM
i expect ggmon to suspend himself now in compliance with bush's desires
1/9/2006 9:40:58 PM
1/9/2006 10:23:14 PM
this makes the internet lame
1/10/2006 12:36:06 AM
Repeat after me: "Unenforceable."
1/10/2006 4:05:49 AM
except when necessaryhey! hey! you think liberal bloggers stand a chance now???[Edited on January 10, 2006 at 7:20 AM. Reason : .]
1/10/2006 7:19:42 AM
1/10/2006 9:32:10 AM
you know I didn't say that. I'm simply implying that under this law, they will be forced to at least reveal their identities.
1/10/2006 10:24:18 AM
“All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void.” Marbury vs. Madison 5 US (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176, (1803)NULL AND VOID. And you don't need a court to say so either. It's already null and void.If Congress passed a law tomorrow saying we have no freedom of speech and anyone speaking out against the government is guilty of a federal crime, would we have to obey such a law? Of course not. The same goes with this "law."[Edited on January 10, 2006 at 10:30 AM. Reason : `]
1/10/2006 10:29:14 AM
+ RIAA has already shown us it is impossible to use " the Internet "without disclosing his identity and with intent to annoy." "
1/10/2006 11:17:25 AM
^^ strawman often?
1/10/2006 2:51:14 PM
that's not a strawman josh
1/10/2006 2:54:36 PM
^ troll
1/10/2006 2:59:29 PM
you said it, it must be true.
1/10/2006 3:17:55 PM
No, this is the death of the Wolf Web...http://www.courttv.com/news/2006/0112/chatroom_suit_ctv.html
1/13/2006 2:13:11 AM