Says T.O.http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/5053182
11/4/2005 5:25:41 PM
i was gonna post thisgg hova
11/4/2005 5:28:58 PM
i was gonna post [old] says dweedle but i couldnt find it posted and remember i read it on ESPN.com a few hours ago
11/4/2005 5:29:55 PM
Favre
11/4/2005 7:18:37 PM
TO DOESNT KNOW SHIT ABOUT FOOTBALLHE SHOULD BE TALKING ABOUT VICK
11/4/2005 7:23:30 PM
hahah my badwhen i was thinkin of how to spell it I said it like Ben Stiller in Something about Mary
11/4/2005 7:54:27 PM
11/4/2005 11:06:02 PM
I would take Favre over McNabb too....it's a no brainer.....but I think McNabb is a good QB...
11/4/2005 11:35:29 PM
TO and Irvin said with Favre, the Eagles would have no losses. And you agree with what he has said. This shows you think a QB can win and lose games. However, when it comes to Vick, you say a QB cant win or lose games. Make up your mind.
11/5/2005 12:37:25 AM
Can we have a sports thread w/o Vick in it?
11/5/2005 12:41:28 AM
Ummm, no. Shaq, Tiger, and Vick are sports. And we all know Vick doesnt play basketball or golf, so he won't be in those threads.[Edited on November 5, 2005 at 12:43 AM. Reason : .]
11/5/2005 12:43:12 AM
11/5/2005 2:13:55 AM
11/5/2005 10:21:34 AM
11/5/2005 11:55:35 AM
x = no. of eagles winsmcnabb + eagles = xfavre + eagles = x'favre > mcnabbTHEREFOREx' > x
11/5/2005 12:10:11 PM
^ i was kidding, but thats a very nice proof
11/5/2005 12:31:41 PM
^^
11/5/2005 12:46:32 PM
11/5/2005 12:52:09 PM