a breakdown of each user's posts likeX in chit chatX in loungeX in entertainmentX in classifieds etcetcwhat do you think?
12/26/2004 11:11:34 PM
good idea i think they should do it
12/26/2004 11:55:38 PM
why? so yall can post stalk more? this should give most of yall a pretty good idea......if you utilize all the sections
12/26/2004 11:58:13 PM
wtf cass? post stalk? I think it would be a much more effective way of judging the serious users of this site. For example someone with 90% of their posts in tech talk and 4% in chit chat I would be more likely to take their technical advice seriously.
12/27/2004 12:02:57 AM
they used to do that in the early daysbut then it started encuraging post padding
12/27/2004 9:32:56 AM
i thought that the problem with post padding came from when they posted the top ten list?
12/27/2004 9:44:32 AM
oicfor some reason i thought it would be a number...but then i realized it would be a %[Edited on December 27, 2004 at 9:46 AM. Reason : .]
12/27/2004 9:46:09 AM
its a good idea i think
12/27/2004 5:14:26 PM
12/27/2004 10:00:25 PM
huh....what does post %/section really have to do with the correct answer to a question?c'mon don't be that gullible now[Edited on December 27, 2004 at 10:07 PM. Reason : .]
12/27/2004 10:07:15 PM
guess whatjust because someone posts in tech talk all the time doesn't mean they have any clue what the fuck they're tlaking aboutwhy do people always try to make the wolfweb more than it is
12/28/2004 11:23:18 AM
^ amen.......i could be the geekiest mofo on this site and never go near tech talk.....and yall would never know and never ask for help
12/28/2004 1:56:12 PM
12/28/2004 2:09:23 PM
if your gonna use tech talk as your sole source for computer help you have problems anyway[Edited on December 28, 2004 at 3:22 PM. Reason : .]
12/28/2004 3:22:15 PM
12/28/2004 6:02:04 PM
it's just a website.
12/28/2004 6:35:14 PM
12/28/2004 7:01:07 PM
you're not sorry ADMIT IT
12/28/2004 7:11:33 PM
12/28/2004 7:37:02 PM
cass you dont get it. you are nowhere even near getting it.
12/28/2004 7:48:31 PM
no i dont get it nor do i care to "get it"i'm just stating the obvious......there is no such thing as a serious user
12/29/2004 12:16:36 AM
I am beginning to wonder if there is such a thing as a serious mod. You obviously arent one, unsuspending mrredemption after his insolence. Way to make an example.
12/30/2004 6:26:07 AM
IT'S JUST A FUCKING WEBSITEIF YOU ARE THAT FUCKING CONCERNED ABOUT THE WAY IT IS OPERATED YOU NEED TO MOVE ON WITH YOUR LIFEGET THE FUCK OVER ITIT'S JUST WORDS ON A SCREENTURN THE COMPUTER OFF AND IT WILL ALL GO AWAY
12/30/2004 10:05:24 AM
there are rules as to how long a user is supposed to be suspended......mrredemption was suspended up until his term. i have talked to him since and everything is cool.....please quit worrying about my position as a moderator because it's obvious that you're jealous.
12/30/2004 11:19:42 AM
to the original posterif it means that muchgo to search, and search for all of their posts, just go section by section
12/30/2004 12:06:50 PM
how bout the total number of posts since the beginning of TWW?
12/30/2004 2:13:12 PM
you cant do that because Jake and Joe deleted everything dated before March 2003 (i think it's March....but definitely sometime in 2003). we needed more space.....so technically you can't do it from the very beginning
12/30/2004 6:00:59 PM
what a stupid fucking idea
12/30/2004 6:37:47 PM
shut up dune coon
12/30/2004 7:29:35 PM
its not that bad of an idea, but some tech talk posts are down right shitty[Edited on December 30, 2004 at 8:32 PM. Reason : ]
12/30/2004 8:32:20 PM
dune coon?i'm white
12/30/2004 11:33:40 PM